24 ms·
Yeah indeed, there's that too, although I'm glad we can't define methods on interfaces (using the interface as method receiver), so it quite reduces the complex
by oelmekki 9y ago
Yeah indeed, there's that too, although I'm glad we can't define methods on interfaces (using the interface as method receiver), so it quite reduces the complexity to just having to figure out the actual type, most often found just by inspecting the caller.