> Perhaps not voter fraud You said it was an example of voter fraud, I guess expecting no one to be familiar with the case or to bother reading the decision. W

> Perhaps not voter fraud You said it was an example of voter fraud, I guess expecting no one to be familiar with the case or to bother reading the decision. What is your game here? > substantially more improperly cast ballots Then fix the ballots and the procedure for casting them. THat's no reason to purge rolls with a 99% error rate in the purging process. > The judge's ruling does not change reality. Neither does you nonsense argument. The ruling does however change settled case law. And wishing it away doesn't make in person voter fraud a problem, which it is not. You are a liar, and you are spinning the truth. You are clearly a shill for the interests that want to purge rightful voters from the rolls. You are an enemy of democracy.