3 ms·
> Yes. I found a single link to to illustrate that it does happen A single instance is an anecdote, not data. You should not make policy by anecdote. >Two dif
by ch4s3 9y ago
> Yes. I found a single link to to illustrate that it does happen
A single instance is an anecdote, not data. You should not make policy by anecdote.
>Two different surveys have found that ~13% of illegal immigrants from Mexico have registered to vote.
Which surveys? By whom? I've never heard that before, and I follow the issue. I'm tempted to call this an outright lie.
> It seems in every election cycle in King County, Washington people mail in ballots of recently deceased relatives.
Again, that's not in person voter fraud, which doesn't exit as a real problem. That's mail in ballot fraud, which none of the voter suppression laws and purges target. I previously said twice, mail in ballot fraud is the only way voter fraud practically ever happens in the US. You are willfully trying to obscure that fact.
> By definition even a single ineligible voter destroys the integrity of an election.
No it doesn't. The margin of error on counting votes is at a state wide level is often measured in 1000s of votes. A single fraudulent vote is noise statistically. You are lying and pandering to fear to support draconian and ridiculous voter roll purges. You are presenting weak arguments and no real evidence. You are trading in anecdote and fear.