3 ms·

What other competitors does Mogo have? I don't ask to go elsewhere, I ask because coincidentally I decided this morning was the day for me to find a better sol

by evlapix 16y ago

What other competitors does Mogo have? I don't ask to go elsewhere, I ask because coincidentally I decided this morning was the day for me to find a better solution to all the crap I've been tolerating for so long in my cross-browser compatibility work. Mogo was the absolute quickest to impress me and I'm curious if I've misevaluated the lot of them, or if I'm so trained to adore anything referred from HN. I need some perspective. nirvdrum, care to compare lists of "Web Testing" tools?

nirvdrum 16y ago
Sure. I'm going to simplify things just because of space constraints, but I'll highlight what I think are the biggest differences. - browsershots.org: Free option (go to the back of the line), paid option (priority), but ultimately screenshots only. - Adobe Browserlab: Pricing not defined? It will be pay, but I don't think they've announced pricing. Single page only results. Just does screenshot comparisons. - Litmus App: I'm not sure if they're completely out of the space. They've been focusing on email render testing. Single page only results, but pretty slick UI. - browsera: Does some of the cross-browser issue detection (we'll be adding this soon, but it's not there yet), but feels clunky to use. Limited browser selection, but they said they're working on that. Doesn't do the general site issue detection we do. Sorry if that was an oversimplification. I'm not trying to misrepresent what the others are doing. Some do some things better than us now, but we're moving pretty quickly on our product, which we think is better in other ways. Primarily, we're amongst the fastest and easiest to set up & use.
- evlapix 16y ago
  No apologies needed. That's is a solid summary. It also confirms my research. I appreciate it.
  - nirvdrum 16y ago
    Just to follow-up, we do have automated issue detection now. So, we're able to detect a whole class of rendering problems and report just the pages you should look at in the browsers that seem problematic.
Reedge 16y ago
I guess http://www.reedge.com http://www.reedge.com is partially a competitor.

by evlapix 16y ago

nirvdrum 16y ago

Sure. I'm going to simplify things just because of space constraints, but I'll highlight what I think are the biggest differences. - browsershots.org: Free option (go to the back of the line), paid option (priority), but ultimately screenshots only. - Adobe Browserlab: Pricing not defined? It will be pay, but I don't think they've announced pricing. Single page only results. Just does screenshot comparisons. - Litmus App: I'm not sure if they're completely out of the space. They've been focusing on email render testing. Single page only results, but pretty slick UI. - browsera: Does some of the cross-browser issue detection (we'll be adding this soon, but it's not there yet), but feels clunky to use. Limited browser selection, but they said they're working on that. Doesn't do the general site issue detection we do. Sorry if that was an oversimplification. I'm not trying to misrepresent what the others are doing. Some do some things better than us now, but we're moving pretty quickly on our product, which we think is better in other ways. Primarily, we're amongst the fastest and easiest to set up & use.

evlapix 16y ago
No apologies needed. That's is a solid summary. It also confirms my research. I appreciate it.
- nirvdrum 16y ago
  Just to follow-up, we do have automated issue detection now. So, we're able to detect a whole class of rendering problems and report just the pages you should look at in the browsers that seem problematic.

Reedge 16y ago

I guess http://www.reedge.com http://www.reedge.com is partially a competitor.