4 ms·

32 is already the new 16.

• yellowapple 9y ago
  That's horrifying.
  • xwvvvvwx 9y ago
    That's progress.
    • flukus 9y ago
      That's regression. Despite having vastly more memory than 20 years ago I'm not getting anything more done with it.
      • trashcan 9y ago
        What OS were you using in 1997? I believe I was using Windows 95 then and was definitely getting a lot less done with it.
• tedmiston 9y ago
  Too many devs are on MacBooks and Apple doesn't even offer a 32 GB option yet. It sounds like Intel will close the gap soon and we'll see it in the next year or two though. Maybe 32 will be the new 16 by then?