3 ms·
The Public Interest Legal Foundation, which you cited, is a right-wing crank group. https://www.mediamatters.org/research/2017/06/07/right-wing-media-hype-flaw
by Bud 9y ago
The Public Interest Legal Foundation, which you cited, is a right-wing crank group.
https://www.mediamatters.org/research/2017/06/07/right-wing-media-hype-flawed-report-illegal-voting-pushed-serial-conservative-misinformers/216819 https://www.mediamatters.org/research/2017/06/07/right-wing-...
- wang_li 9y agoYour media matters link doesn't provide an academic work showing that the cited statistic is incorrect. The closest it comes to doing so is by linking a paper by the Brennan Center which says in a footnote that the PILF report uses an unreliable methodology. That's about what you can expect from a left-wing advocacy group. Here is the footnote in full: >See, e.g., Public Interest Legal Foundation, Alien Invasion in Virginia, 2016, https://publicinterestlegal.org/ https://publicinterestlegal.org/ files/Report_Alien-Invasion-in-Virginia.pdf; Public Interest Legal Foundation, Aliens & Felons, 2016, https://publicinterestlegal.org/files/Philadelphia-Litigation-Report.pdf https://publicinterestlegal.org/files/Philadelphia-Litigatio.... Despite using unreliable methodology, these reports, authored by an organization that promotes the myth of widespread voter fraud, identified few noncitizens on the rolls.