3 ms·
On macOS, web app wrappers created with Fluid (http://fluidapp.com http://fluidapp.com) consistently use less resources than the official Electron-based version
by dictum 9y ago
On macOS, web app wrappers created with Fluid (http://fluidapp.com http://fluidapp.com) consistently use less resources than the official Electron-based versions, in my experience.
It's a wrapper for the system-supplied Webkit, so it inherits those benefits from that. I've been experiencing a similar performance to Chrome in Safari 11, but lower RAM/CPU/GPU usage overall.
- mikewhy 9y agoI used Fluid, now use MacPin. Apps are much smaller, essentially just the size of their JS bundles. But then you're back to cross-browser woes and no native layer.