4 ms·
I think this is the best way to look at projects like these. It's not an exercise in efficiency, or even attempting to prove that HTML + CSS is somehow better
by nxsynonym 9y ago
I think this is the best way to look at projects like these.
It's not an exercise in efficiency, or even attempting to prove that HTML + CSS is somehow better than a JS version. I think it's about getting as much as you can out of CSS and HTML. As a viewer, looking at these projects usually give me 2-3 tricks to add to my collection and is worth the read.
I honestly don't think I'll ever NEED to implement a CSS+HTML calculator sans JS, but it's nice to know that it's possible and it could be something I look at if I want to implement a piece of it for something similar.
- tracker1 9y agoExactly, but it's an example as to similarly, it bugs me to no end when I see styled radio/checkboxes that rely on JS at all. I'm still wrapping my head around flexbox though... The naming conventions and rules are just weird and alien to me, and been at it for over a year now off and on.