3 ms·
For a contrived example, let's make the following assumptions: 1) There is no inflation. 2) Your capital investments always return 5%. 3) Your salary is $100
by mfoy_ 9y ago
For a contrived example, let's make the following assumptions:
1) There is no inflation.
2) Your capital investments always return 5%.
3) Your salary is $100,000 and does not change.
4) You are able to save 50% of your income and invest it.
At year 0, you are worth the equivalent of $2,000,000 invested. It won't be until year 40 that your investments are returning the same amount as your starting salary. Presumably, you plan to retire sometime around year 45 (~65-ish).
Thing is, there is inflation, a 5% return isn't guaranteed, your salary will probably increase, and saving 50% is pretty ambitious. All of these things actually make it harder to get a better return than your salary.
- tanderson92 9y agoThis is incomplete as well as incorrect. It is incomplete because: presumably you do not die immediately upon retirement. A 30 year retirement would see your investments compound for an additional 30 years after your career income stream ceases. This can dwarf the $2M total you save over a 40 year career at $50k/yr. It is incorrect because even after the 40 years your net worth is $6.5M on gross lifetime earnings of $4M.