>If Apple does not want their devices to be used as intended until an embargo date has passed they should keep them on premises. Once the device is out of the g

>If Apple does not want their devices to be used as intended until an embargo date has passed they should keep them on premises. Once the device is out of the gates the secret is out as well. Okay, but testing consumer products in the real world is an extremely common occurrence, and you have to walk a fine line between inadequate testing and product disclosure. Its fine to propose idealistic solutions, but without providing means of actually implementing those proposals, it doesn't help anyone. Keeping radio devices confined on premises would have severely impacted their testing. >As soon as you're talking about devices and/or kids NDA's are ineffective because anybody that spots the device can post a picture without any recourse by the company and kids will do whatever they want to in today's connected world. That's not the same as giving your kid an unreleased product. The adult is still responsible for _their_ actions.