3 ms·
Respectfully disagree. The end of the post is absolutely true and supports the title: > On the Trinet, if you are permanently banned from GOOG or FB, you would
by bambax 9y ago
Respectfully disagree. The end of the post is absolutely true and supports the title:
> On the Trinet, if you are permanently banned from GOOG or FB, you would have no alternative. You could even be restricted from creating a new account. As private businesses, GOOG, FB, and AMZN don’t need to guarantee you access to their networks. You do not have a legal right to an account in their servers, and as societies we aren’t demanding for these rights as vehemently as we could, to counter the strategies that tech giants are putting forward.
This specific part (that dominant companies can ban individuals with no recourse) shouldn't be tolerated.
- s73ver_ 9y agoI'm sorry, but I can't get behind the idea that you're entitled to an account on a private company's site. Are they obligated to protect accounts for shitposters, to the detriment of everyone else's experience? Nobody is stopping you from starting your own blog and posting your views there. But, just like no one is obligated to seek out a flyer you post on a telephone pole, no one is obligated to seek out your writings.