Your argument is that the web is now mainly controlled by two companies, not “dead”. The technology is still there but the diverse hosting options and the crea

Your argument is that the web is now mainly controlled by two companies, not “dead”. The technology is still there but the diverse hosting options and the creativity that many of us associated with it (what could be called “the spirit of the original web”) could be in peril. I don’t think that you are arguing that Google and Facebook are fighting HTTP/HTML - although they are offering alternatives that they present as technologically preferable.