6 ms·
Transform SVG into React components
- peterchau 9y agoAmazing.
- avitzurel 9y agoHN is really aware of these type of comments. An account created 47 minutes ago. A single comment on this post.
- askmike 9y agoThis does exactly what I have been doing manually for at least ~15 times in the last week. If only I saw this a few weeks ago.. (It's easy / not lot of work, but why if we can automate?)
- debaserab2 9y agoLet's not forget, sometimes when you need some really basic functionality, you don't have to reach for a module that maybe does a lot more than what you need. For example, the last time I needed svg inlined into a web app I was working on, this is the quick component that I whipped up: https://gist.github.com/ajbdev/8d15e302564fe04a7d383c1a54f8d97d https://gist.github.com/ajbdev/8d15e302564fe04a7d383c1a54f8d... Despite it's simplicity, it has yet to fail me.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- iamleppert 9y agoThis is doing little more than providing a wrapper around svgo, which is doing all the real work. This is generally a poor use of SVG as well, if your use of SVG is for static assets, don't transform all your SVG into react, leave it as SVG where it can be easily manipulated and editing by the plethora of tools that can work directly with SVG, previewed in the browser, etc. If you need you can inline the SVG into your CSS via a base64 URI, etc.
- TheCoreh 9y agoIdeally this is applied as a webpack transform, so the asset is left as SVG, and only converted during the build process. Inlining the SVG as Base 64 in CSS is not that good, since it limits what you can do with it (basically setting it as a background). If you create an actual SVG tag within HTML (via React) you can then use CSS to style the strokes, fills, etc.
- rpastuszak 9y agoBase64-encoded SVGs have a terrible impact on performance on mobile, so I'd be careful with that. Saying that, the situation has improved in the past few years (mostly because of hardware, not browser optimisations afair)
- oelmekki 9y agoI love adding my svg as react components, actually. It makes it easy to conditionally toggle parts of it, change text, manage colors, etc. Of course, if you just want to use the svg doc as a static icon, then yes by all mean, a plain file will do. But given the (very small) size of a svg file, caching it as a single resource may not be that useful.
- andreasklinger 9y agoagree most people who do inline styles (or any form of "my styling is written in the react file") do this afair we inline for the same reason i hope someone writes a good precompiler that allows efficient using def/use for (non changed) static inlining http://www.svgbasics.com/defs.html http://www.svgbasics.com/defs.html
- leeoniya 9y ago"Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should."
- josteink 9y agoIf I can have only one question, it would no doubt be “why”?
- abritinthebay 9y agoWe do this at my work - it allows easy programmatic inclusion. We wouldn’t do it if browsers weren’t a buggy mess with the USE tag though (Chrome in particular is a dumpster fire of SVG bugs).
- tehno 9y agoYeah, USE tag is pretty buggy across browsers. Also, sometime you just need to inline SVG, for example if you want some icon path fill color to change on mouse-over. Easy with inline SVG and CSS rule. Can't really do that (well) with external .svg.
- abritinthebay 9y agoWe actually had a nice system for that... but again: browser bugs :( Until browsers collectively get off their asses with SVG (most of these bugs are years old in their big trackers) using React for SVGs is a good workaround.
- Already__Taken 9y agoThey won't because it seems like they might as well forge ahead with CSS additions and drop an entirely separate renderer. That's what happened to the SVG Animations. Of course it's not like svg will get removed so Why fight it...
- abritinthebay 9y agoIt seems they stop work as soon as a feature hits SVG - CSS Animation, Canvas, WebGL... all have open SVG bugs. Some years old.
- 9y ago
- photonios 9y agoDoesn't `react-svg-loader`[0] do the same? [0] https://github.com/boopathi/react-svg-loader https://github.com/boopathi/react-svg-loader
- Klonoar 9y agoI'd done this awhile ago with https://github.com/ryanmcgrath/react-iconpack https://github.com/ryanmcgrath/react-iconpack (haven't touched it in literally forever, at least insofar as time is considered in the JavaScript world - probably doesn't work now), too. Never caught on for whatever reason, but was fun to hack together. I do feel like (and I think another commenter somewhere in here noted this) that actually fully converting SVGs to JS has a lot of detriments in terms of ability to edit and such, so the loader approach is better.
- photonios 9y agoAnother approach which I use at work is to use `postcss-inline-svg`[0]. This allows you to "import' the SVG from your CSS and then customize it. For example, you might want the icon in a different color: background: svg-load('myicon.svg', fill=blue); The SVG would then be inlined into the CSS instead of the HTML. [0] https://github.com/TrySound/postcss-inline-svg https://github.com/TrySound/postcss-inline-svg
- gjjones 9y agoSuper cool to see other people using this pattern! People here are bringing up great points about the implications of this pattern. Our motivation to use this pattern was when replacing grunticon generating multiple colors of our SVGs during a build step. The grunticon step added a 1min+ to the feedback loop on seeing CSS changes(could have fixed this directly, lots of missed details in this story). This simple script allowed us to quickly move past the problem during a rewrite to React, and solve more correctly when that system was a priority. https://gitlab.com/gjjones/svg-to-react https://gitlab.com/gjjones/svg-to-react