3 ms·
Second, declaring someone to be an outlaw would make it illegal to transact basically any business with them. ... In this sense, outlawry could be considered an
by adrianratnapala 9y ago
Second, declaring someone to be an outlaw would make it illegal to transact basically any business with them. ... In this sense, outlawry could be considered an absolute economic embargo targeted at a person or persons rather than a state or government.
Governments, and even political pressure groups, are re-inventing this aspect of outlawry when they freeze bank accounts and use more informal kinds of pressure to make 3rd parties punish people.
Partly they do this for the same reason as medieval courts: it's a work-around for the fact that people are hard to reach because they live overseas. But also note, these new methods can be used without a court order. Which raises the suspicion that the real limitations being worked around are tedious matters like the presumption of innocence and due process of law.
- sandworm101 9y ago>> ...tedious matters like the presumption of innocence and due process of law. As the OP states, outlawry was generally used where people refused to submit to a court. They have chosen not to exercise their due process rights and we therefore presume them guilty (the other option being to presume them innocent and therefore encourage everyone to abscond). In the modern context, economic sanctions on individuals or organizations are used where the person is outside the court's jurisdiction but their assets are not.
- adrianratnapala 9y agoAFAIK, you don't have to be outside a courts to have your accounts frozen.