3 ms·
Both, meeting somewhere in the middle - nuclear waste is treated way too carefully, and non-nuclear heavy metal waste is treated rather too carelessly. Either w
by saulrh 9y ago
Both, meeting somewhere in the middle - nuclear waste is treated way too carefully, and non-nuclear heavy metal waste is treated rather too carelessly. Either way, the important point is for the level of care to be proportional to the actual danger, rather than determined entirely by whether it's called "radioactive" or not.
- eru 9y agoCoal ash is even worse in its treatment: thanks to some intense lobbying in the US it's not treated as hazardous waste.