3 ms·
> Folks push it because it's Indian and understood by most. I don't ... dispute that? You're continuing with the non sequiturs and it's really hard to tell wha
by Manishearth 9y ago
> Folks push it because it's Indian and understood by most.
I don't ... dispute that? You're continuing with the non sequiturs and it's really hard to tell what point you're trying to make.
("most" is also "bit more than half the population", which isn't that compelling)
> Folks resist and protest because it's not their native language and somehow worse than having English everywhere.
You have not understood the resistance. People don't think it's "somehow worse than having English everywhere". There is no analogous push for English everywhere that people are not opposing.
- eklavya 9y agoI am sorry. This is not in response to your particular comment. Was just trying to have a conversation.