4 ms·
He wasn’t fired because the video ended up online. He was fired because he let her film the video. That was a direct action. As an outsider, I agree that this l
by clintonb 9y ago
He wasn’t fired because the video ended up online. He was fired because he let her film the video. That was a direct action. As an outsider, I agree that this level of secrecy seems over the top. However, that is what the employees accept when they join, so it’s their obligation to hold up their end of the bargain.
- LeoPanthera 9y agoHe did more than let her, he participated in the video, demonstrating animojis.
- AlphaSite 9y agowasn't it at apple HQ as well?
- osrec 9y agoI get that, but in that case you could lay the blame with apple's security policy. Why did they allow a non employee in with a smartphone and tempt fate?!
- dpark 9y ago> allow a non employee in with a smartphone I don't think Apple engaging in TSA-type security and patting down everyone to make sure they aren't carrying a cell phone is a good alternative. And if you're going to say that they wouldn't enforce the ban, just have a policy, then I'll ask why that policy would work when the existing one didn't.