You didn't address the substance of the argument, therefore I can only conclude that you didn't read more than the first few paragraphs. The article is quite de

You didn't address the substance of the argument, therefore I can only conclude that you didn't read more than the first few paragraphs. The article is quite detailed, and plainly states that it's not a indictment of 37s the company, their products, or their business model. Instead, it explains why their business advice doesn't apply to most startups. It goes on to talk about pricing theory as it relates to one specific sector (software) and sectors within software (e.g. social startups vs a value-add, business startup). Pricing is not a solved problem, nor is it straightforward, and the article acknowledges this fact, and elaborates on it. As you didn't address any of this, I can only conclude that your post is a knee-jerk defense of a company you like which relies on an ad hominem attack in an attempt to discredit the author, rather than making any useful arguments yourself.