3 ms·

However when it comes to speakers advocating racism, race is not even real, there is only one human race with ethnic variations we don't allow people to come to

However when it comes to speakers advocating racism, race is not even real, there is only one human race with ethnic variations we don't allow people to come to medical schools to advocate using voodoo doll to cure cancer why should racists be speaking on college campuses?

throwgoog452 9y ago
Race is real. It's obvious when you look around. The major continental races show up on any k-clustered human genomic analysis. And any competent forensic anthropologist can identity race from skeletal remains. We should treat people with equal dignity. Race should not be a factor in individual decisions. Left doesn't stop there, though. They go further, insisting that race is not only irrelevant, but unreal. They step beyond fairness and into propaganda and lies. It's why the left is now on the retreat in every institution of power. I'm not the only one who's sick of having to parrot lies. By alienating people like me, people who would ordinarily be sympathetic to the left's causes, the left is guaranteeing a conservative backlash of biblical scope.
gozur88 9y ago
The vast majority of the people accused of being racists aren't actually racists. But even if they were, it's not your place to decide who gets to speak and who doesn't.
thrden 9y ago
Perhaps, but then you run into the problem of defining racism. It can be obvious, but you can also have situations like the one in yale where the english curriculum was "Colonized"[1] by the fact it had too many white male writers. Would someone who advocates for teaching the traditionally accepted cannon of english literature be racist. According to some definitions, yes. Further, some are willing to call the fundamentals of math racist[2]. Racism can be subtle as well as obvious, and to define the parameters of acceptable speech based on subjective understanding of that subtlety seems that it would likely lead to abuse. [1]http://college.usatoday.com/2016/06/10/yale-undergraduates-aim-to-decolonize-the-english-departments-curriculum/ http://college.usatoday.com/2016/06/10/yale-undergraduates-a... [2]www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5018223/Professor-says-math-perpetuates-white-privilege.html
- brador 9y ago
  [1] is fake news. [2] is a single professor from a low-tier university with the article intended to incite outrage and divide through inducing fear in the reader, which is what you felt. Please be more careful where you are sourcing your brain food.
KGIII 9y ago
My view on the freedom of expression is well known, so I'll try to avoid being verbose. Does the institution receive funding from the government? If so, can it legally prohibit lawful speech? SCOTUS has pretty much decided that it can not. In time, this will be a more settled matter. America is still young, comparatively speaking. We will be okay so long as we remember it's a constant effort and not a final state.

throwgoog452 9y ago

Race is real. It's obvious when you look around. The major continental races show up on any k-clustered human genomic analysis. And any competent forensic anthropologist can identity race from skeletal remains. We should treat people with equal dignity. Race should not be a factor in individual decisions. Left doesn't stop there, though. They go further, insisting that race is not only irrelevant, but unreal. They step beyond fairness and into propaganda and lies. It's why the left is now on the retreat in every institution of power. I'm not the only one who's sick of having to parrot lies. By alienating people like me, people who would ordinarily be sympathetic to the left's causes, the left is guaranteeing a conservative backlash of biblical scope.

gozur88 9y ago

The vast majority of the people accused of being racists aren't actually racists. But even if they were, it's not your place to decide who gets to speak and who doesn't.

thrden 9y ago

Perhaps, but then you run into the problem of defining racism. It can be obvious, but you can also have situations like the one in yale where the english curriculum was "Colonized"[1] by the fact it had too many white male writers. Would someone who advocates for teaching the traditionally accepted cannon of english literature be racist. According to some definitions, yes. Further, some are willing to call the fundamentals of math racist[2]. Racism can be subtle as well as obvious, and to define the parameters of acceptable speech based on subjective understanding of that subtlety seems that it would likely lead to abuse. [1]http://college.usatoday.com/2016/06/10/yale-undergraduates-aim-to-decolonize-the-english-departments-curriculum/ http://college.usatoday.com/2016/06/10/yale-undergraduates-a... [2]www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5018223/Professor-says-math-perpetuates-white-privilege.html

brador 9y ago
[1] is fake news. [2] is a single professor from a low-tier university with the article intended to incite outrage and divide through inducing fear in the reader, which is what you felt. Please be more careful where you are sourcing your brain food.

KGIII 9y ago

My view on the freedom of expression is well known, so I'll try to avoid being verbose. Does the institution receive funding from the government? If so, can it legally prohibit lawful speech? SCOTUS has pretty much decided that it can not. In time, this will be a more settled matter. America is still young, comparatively speaking. We will be okay so long as we remember it's a constant effort and not a final state.