I would agree with this if it could be shown in practice that the U.S. is incredibly impressioned by propaganda. I don't think it's bad for a private company to

I would agree with this if it could be shown in practice that the U.S. is incredibly impressioned by propaganda. I don't think it's bad for a private company to decide that advertising interests that represent a foreign adversary. While purely it is correct that it is "dangerous to free expression", I think it is worthwhile to take a step back and ask if all free expression is worth protecting in a world where demagogues are elected by a relatively uninformed public, where just enough of the voter base has a disdain for science and fact-based reasoning to elect officials that corrode the democracy that is, in part, responsible for upholding the tenet of free speech anyways.