2 ms·
Kudos for acknowledging that you don't have to use this project, but the rest of your post reads like a tantrum. Notably, public complaining wasn't forbidden, a
by weberc2 9y ago
Kudos for acknowledging that you don't have to use this project, but the rest of your post reads like a tantrum. Notably, public complaining wasn't forbidden, as you claim, they insinuated that they wouldn't engage public complaints. Further, you seem to fail to understand that the goal of Reason is to make OCaml more familiar to mainstream developers, not to existing OCAML developers. Unless you wanted to communicate a deep emotional attachment to OCaml's syntax, this post could be improved by simply saying what you dislike about Reason's direction and leaving it at that.
- anonc10 9y agoI don't read it as a tantrum. It is an accurate description of the attitude that prevails in SOME Silicon Valley corporations: 1) Take an existing valuable codebase and add some personal touch. 2) Promote the heck out of it. 3) Slowly, people associate all the goodness with said company and the "new" codebase. 4) Tell critics to take a hike.