> If someone owns useful land, but prefers to leave it fallow Which makes your argument absolutely hilarious, because there's actually a provision for houses t

> If someone owns useful land, but prefers to leave it fallow Which makes your argument absolutely hilarious, because there's actually a provision for houses that aren't used that allows squaters to take over and own it legally. It's called "Adverse Possession." So yeah, people who abandon (the use of) property... don't actually have the right to hold onto it forever. It's almost like the law favors society over complete assholes.