3 ms·

You can use psc-package instead of Bower.

• bjz_ 9y ago
  Oh, this is great: https://github.com/purescript/psc-package https://github.com/purescript/psc-package Any word of when this will be supported/promoted officially? Just got this response from one of my former JS colleagues: https://twitter.com/keirasaid/status/924169973878046721 https://twitter.com/keirasaid/status/924169973878046721 - it's pretty hard to convince JS developers to use something that is still recommends using Bower for package management. :/
  • dualogy 9y ago
    "Officially" isn't really a thing here, I feel. I mean the `purs` (formerly `psc`) compiler just gets given a list of .purs files from your build setup (pulp, custom make files, a little custom program, whatever) and recompiles what changed to the given output paths. I think they just converged on bower by accident (whatever it professes to offer, the sub-set of features required here for PS apparenty just-worked sufficiently well) but really anyone can manage their packages however they like. psc-package does* very much look like it's going to be the "sanctioned/endorses/semi-official" tooling for pkg-mgmt one way or the other. This popped up just now in my feed reader: https://qiita.com/kimagure/items/0d9354900d7a7dbd3864 https://qiita.com/kimagure/items/0d9354900d7a7dbd3864