4 ms·
> Wonder why it didn't get picked up despite being a standard :( It doesn't work on the real internet, only on some fantasy internet that merely exists in the
by hannob 9y ago
> Wonder why it didn't get picked up despite being a standard :(
It doesn't work on the real internet, only on some fantasy internet that merely exists in the head of DNSSEC advocates.
Basically you can only do DNSSEC if you can receive arbitrary DNS records. That's not the case for a non-negligible portion of Internet accesses, where those queries get filtered. Adam Langley has pointed this out years ago:
https://www.imperialviolet.org/2015/01/17/notdane.html https://www.imperialviolet.org/2015/01/17/notdane.html
So if you want to deploy DANE you can choose between falling back to insecure (so it's entirely pointless) or breaking the Internet for a large fraction of users. Neither is a very good plan.
- lmm 9y agoThe same could have been said about HTTPS 10 or even 5 years ago - a significant portion of internet users couldn't access it for one reason or another. And yet we're managing to transition to an HTTPS- only web. No reason DANE couldn't be progressively deployed the same way.