4 ms·
No, it's not. The position paper (from an organization whose whole mission is to push solar and get rid of nuclear) simply makes up a bunch of number. http://v.
by rvcx 16y ago
No, it's not. The position paper (from an organization whose whole mission is to push solar and get rid of nuclear) simply makes up a bunch of number. http://v.cx/2010/07/lying-about-solar http://v.cx/2010/07/lying-about-solar
- kaitnieks 16y agoAlso, this: http://atomicinsights.blogspot.com/2010/07/gullible-reporting-by-new-york-times-on.html http://atomicinsights.blogspot.com/2010/07/gullible-reportin...
- sasvari 16y agoPro-nuclear advocate as the first post is pro-solar, this one is just the opposite. both posts are nonobjective, there's still quite a lot of religion involved in the discussion.
- rvcx 16y agoThe top post is claiming something that is not true. The responses are pointing out that the claim is bullshit, but they are not making claims of their own. Suppose I were to claim that Sasvari owes me one trillion dollars, based on no reliable evidence whatsoever, and Sasvari were to deny it, pointing out the lack of evidence. Are both sides in this scenario equally "religious" in their stances?