4 ms·
I think soneca's point was Brazil is still developing irrespective of any language barriers. So how does your statistics on PPP become an argument for that?
by deanstag 9y ago
I think soneca's point was Brazil is still developing irrespective of any language barriers. So how does your statistics on PPP become an argument for that?
- astrodust 9y agoRampant foreign interference and military juntas have a way of stunting your country's development.
- deanstag 9y agoAre you talking about Brazil or India here? ( I apologize in advance if it looks like I am arguing by asking questions. But I am asking because of curiosity/lack of knowledge )
- astrodust 9y agoSpecifically Brazil here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brazilian_Military_Junta_of_1969 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brazilian_Military_Junta_of_19... Decades of military rule is not good for your economy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brazilian_military_government https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brazilian_military_government Not that India hasn't had more than its fair share of both over the centuries.
- ravirajx7 9y agoThere lies a difference between 'developing' & 'developed' and my point regarding it is with the development pace which is comparatively slow against Brazil or any other developing nation which usually has very few language as an official one. Brazil has only one 'Portuguese' as an official language but India has far too many.