5 ms·
Pretty sure I first read about them in a PC World magazine I got at the airport on a family vacation in like 2003
by cududa 9y ago
Pretty sure I first read about them in a PC World magazine I got at the airport on a family vacation in like 2003
- Alex3917 9y agoAs far as I know I submitted the first ever article about memristors to HN, which was this in 2008: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=177865 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=177865
- 1024core 9y agoThere was a world of media before HN, you know. Just saying.
- andrepd 9y agoI don't think he was implying otherwise.
- squeaky-clean 9y agoHN has only been around since 2007
- kbenson 9y agoAmbiguous language. I thank what was being implied is that it was the first occurrence of that type of article on HN, not that the article was the first ever about memristers and was posted to HN.
- squeaky-clean 9y agoNot really that relevant to the ongoing point of the age of memristor articles then.
- WorldMaker 9y agoIt's been a dream since the term was invented in 1971. HP Lab's big announcement that they had cracked memristors and they were right around the corner was in 2008 (which is quite nearly a decade ago now).
- mitchty 9y agoDoubtful, the first purpose built memristor existed in 2008. Though to be honest we've seen them since the 1800's as oddities in certain electrical circuits. They've been theorized since 1971 mathmatically but until fairly recently haven't been a thing. It is the fourth fundamental circuit, give it a while before discounting it. And be happy you're alive when the fourth fundamental circuit was discovered and made real.
- 52-6F-62 9y agoFeynman also ranted about how much processing within the memory would speed computing in the 80's. He challenged those "computer scientists" to figure it out :P .... this lecture: http://cse.unl.edu/~seth/434/Web%20Links%20and%20Docs/Feynman-future%20computing%20machines.pdf http://cse.unl.edu/~seth/434/Web%20Links%20and%20Docs/Feynma...
- tCfD 9y agoThat's how I heard of them referred to since at least the early 90's, as processor-in-memory. I didn't know memristor was referring to the same concept.
- unixhero 9y agoVery insightful post. Thanks for that. I skimmed the paper and enjoyed the illustrations, and the photos at the end :). So Memristors are about reversible gates instead of non-reversible NAND gates?
- 52-6F-62 9y agoI think what he implied was that more reliable calculations would come from reversible gates, though they'd ultimately be slower. The speed being one of the main reasons they weren't used in processor design. One of the solutions for that problem was the parallel design that could compensate for the slowdown of individual calculations by the ability to run many at the same time, and of course the increased rate of transmission by performing the calculations right within the memory instead of the added latency of fetching and storing values every values and performing every calculation synchronously. So I think it's more that memristors would be a solution that allows the use of reversible gates making for more reliable processors. If anybody else has any better insight, fire away.