4 ms·
I switched to vim, because I wanted a command from visual studio. That command was "of" that allowed to open any file of the project with incremental completion
by ecaradec 16y ago
I switched to vim, because I wanted a command from visual studio. That command was "of" that allowed to open any file of the project with incremental completion. I know that many consider VS to be a crappy editor, but if you know many shortcuts, command console and macros it's actually nice.
But it's an IDE and I needed something for javascript files and html files that was in the range. So I switched for this only reason. I switched the exact same way you did, using the mouse at first, I spent time in the help for every issue I had, I learned motions, macros, etc...
Interestingly I've never found something as neat as the "of" command of VS, but I loved all the rest.
- dan00 16y ago"That command was "of" that allowed to open any file of the project with incremental completion." Have a look at http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1984 http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1984. I love it!
- ecaradec 16y agoI tried it but I often work with lot of subdirectories and many files and that script abort when it reach 200 files. Increasing the limit beyond that would be slow. I use the Project plugin switch to the buffer, search with incremental completion. At least it's cached so it's faster, that's not to bad, but I find it less integrated than VS.
- dan00 16y ago"At least it's cached so it's faster, that's not to bad, but I find it less integrated than VS." Perhaps you used an older version, because the version I'm using is caching (2.22.3).
- pyre 16y agohttp://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1890 http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1890