5 ms·
Bittorrent itself may or may not exhibit power law issues. I'm guessing that it does... certainly the ratio of seeders to downloaders has always been bad. But
by nwah1 9y ago
Bittorrent itself may or may not exhibit power law issues. I'm guessing that it does... certainly the ratio of seeders to downloaders has always been bad.
But even if that were not true, Bittorrent is just a subcategory of filesharing in general, and it is abundantly obvious that the vast majority of filesharing occurs through centralized networks. (Google, Dropbox, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, etc)
So, in this case, Bittorrent is akin to these bespoke decentralized social networks that very few people use, and doesn't contradict the article at all.
- thriftwy 9y ago> certainly the ratio of seeders to downloaders has always been bad Not an issue usually. > it is abundantly obvious that the vast majority of filesharing occurs through centralized networks Whoa whoa, that's a strong clause, I remember times when BitTorrent was responsible for 70% of traffic (period). > bespoke decentralized social networks that very few people use You're definitely living in a parallel reality.
- nwah1 9y agoNowadays, Netflix alone is about 40% of traffic. Throw in youtube and you're already over half. But even pirated content had largely been migrated to centralized streaming services. Megaupload started that trend, although I'm not sure what the leaders are now. When people search for pirated content, they use streaming. When people want to listen to a song, they use youtube or spotify. When people want porn, they use PornHub. I use bittorrent for linux ISOs and such, but I certainly haven't used it for video content in years, and most people I know don't use it.