3 ms·
Using your own reasoning one would end up with absurd conclusions such as that sandboxing shouldn't be added, "You call it a security layer. I call it an extra
by jerheinze 9y ago
Using your own reasoning one would end up with absurd conclusions such as that sandboxing shouldn't be added, "You call it a security layer. I call it an extra attack surface." Therefore your reasoning is fallacious.
- jstewartmobile 9y agoMy reasoning is no more fallacious than your reading comprehension. If sandboxing is necessary to make things manageable, it should be baked-in rather than being yet another moving layer inserted into the hundreds we already have. The combinatorics of PC development/security/maintenance/etc are ridiculous enough as it is.
- jerheinze 9y agoYou're still missing the point which is that it doesn't make it less secure (which is what you claimed), in fact, it makes it more secure.