3 ms·

I interpret the contrary of property rights. A land owner should decide what happens on his land, but what he can ask of his neighbors should be very limited. A

I interpret the contrary of property rights. A land owner should decide what happens on his land, but what he can ask of his neighbors should be very limited. A person with a land in nz can't sell it to a foreigner, he is being deprived of his property rights. I wouldnt be surprised if a measure like this ends up unconstitutional (no idea about nz constitution)

elyobo 9y ago
NZ doesn't have a real, single constitution, more a collection of case law[1]. I'd argue that if a person can no longer reasonably expect to buy a house in their own country then they're being deprived of their rights and that this is a more significant loss than others losing their "rights" to tax free profit from their property speculations. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_New_Zealand https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_New_Zealand