3 ms·
Very interesting stuff. I see it's more suitable for academic papers and news articles (am I right?). I like the UI, but it has some glitches like unexpected s
by bernardhalas 9y ago
Very interesting stuff. I see it's more suitable for academic papers and news articles (am I right?).
I like the UI, but it has some glitches like unexpected scrolling behavior when looking at the results of the url demo - if I scroll up/down in the result frame I don't expect the whole page to go up/down. Also I spotted that the same paragraph was listed twice in the result, but I assume this is still a WIP.
Other than that the call-to-action and workflow itself is easy to understand and follow, which is great.
If you are looking for more UX feedback, please feel free to submit your site to our free UX community platform: https://usability.testing.exchange https://usability.testing.exchange. There are more people like me to help you.
- anastasia_htsk 9y agoHi Bernard! Thanks you for the feedback. You're right - it's a handy tool for processing academic papers, news articles and other many-page documents. Bernard, as for glitches, it looks like you used the demo. Please, take a moment to discover Conceptmeister app where we've already fixed the enumerated bugs.