3 ms·

" That's not the case for simply selling a piece of property to a willing buyer." Not quite. A wealthy citizen of a 3rd world country has used the fact that h

" That's not the case for simply selling a piece of property to a willing buyer." Not quite. A wealthy citizen of a 3rd world country has used the fact that he can pollute and treat his staff like slaves - to make tons of money. He can then go to another country wherein surpluses are spread more evenly - buy up property - and start to dominate those people economically as well. One could make the cases that 'you cannot buy homes in our country unless you're a citizen of a country with similar rules regarding externalities like the environment, human rights' etc.. Because a lot of this money is coming from countries where all sorts of externalizations are made. Same thing for manufacturing: we 'stop hiring' in locale A and go to 'locale B' where we can pollute and have slaves. You can't really look at it solely from the context of locale A. For the same reason different nations have separate currencies, I think we need to separate domicile policy.

harryh 9y ago
Nations have separate currencies because if they didn't some regions with experience inflationary monetary policies while others would experience deflationary ones. It would be impossible for central banks to do their jobs. You can see this in action in Europe with the Euro which was, and is, a bad idea. How does this reason translate to housing policy?
- alexasmyths 9y ago
  " some regions with experience inflationary monetary policies while others would experience deflationary ones. " Housing - and capital inflows/outflows - are primary drivers of inflation! (FYI I know housing is generally not included in inflation targets, but it really should be because it's where inflation can effectively be hidden). Ergo - strongly related to the issue at hand. Put simpler: those who come from countries with a different currency should not be able to buy residential property. :)

harryh 9y ago

Nations have separate currencies because if they didn't some regions with experience inflationary monetary policies while others would experience deflationary ones. It would be impossible for central banks to do their jobs. You can see this in action in Europe with the Euro which was, and is, a bad idea. How does this reason translate to housing policy?

alexasmyths 9y ago
" some regions with experience inflationary monetary policies while others would experience deflationary ones. " Housing - and capital inflows/outflows - are primary drivers of inflation! (FYI I know housing is generally not included in inflation targets, but it really should be because it's where inflation can effectively be hidden). Ergo - strongly related to the issue at hand. Put simpler: those who come from countries with a different currency should not be able to buy residential property. :)