3 ms·
Thanks for the recommendation. I found this clip that summarizes Vincent Bugliosi's Reclaiming History [0]. [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhA54xrPTOE htt
by arkitaip 9y ago
Thanks for the recommendation. I found this clip that summarizes Vincent Bugliosi's Reclaiming History [0].
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhA54xrPTOE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhA54xrPTOE
EDIT: I love how conspiracy theorists are downvoting my comment for simply linking to a video clip. Seems like this post has flushed out every nutjob on HN.
- jayess 9y agoThank you, that sums up a small part of the story very well. One thing I've learned is that the conspiracy folks lie and frequently take statements out of context. I insist on primary sources. There is so much BS out there in favor of a conspiracy that it's almost hopeless to counter it all. Bugliosi basically does, but it's a shame that few people will read his book. Another bit of compelling evidence that the president was shot from behind (BTW, ALL of the ballistic trajectories match perfectly with the Oswald window of the school book depository), is this stabilized zapruder film: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sqk3sdfXFkc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sqk3sdfXFkc
- mhneu 9y agoBugliosi also wrote a good book on the OJ case that similarly cuts through the fluff and lays out the most plausible theory (that OJ did it).
- jMyles 9y agoI didn't downvote you, but I think that people are probably downvoting you because this video is cheesy, silly, melodramatic, and uninformative. It obviously cherry-picks facts, literally cutting people off right before they make exculpatory remarks. The rapid cuts, background music, and clips of dramatization make it difficult to take seriously. If this video is the best support for the "lone nut" theory that can fit into 30 minutes, I think that the conspiracy theory looks pretty darn strong by contrast.