While I agree that IJ's internals are spaghetti, the VS LSP isn't quite the same, or at least, it appears to me, it does not offer the richness of IJ. Consider

While I agree that IJ's internals are spaghetti, the VS LSP isn't quite the same, or at least, it appears to me, it does not offer the richness of IJ. Consider that IntelliJ can syntax color and autocomplete multiple language grammars at once, e.g. String aJavaString = "<someHtml onFoo='someJs.style=\"color: red\"; var regex = new Regex(\"someRegex\");'"> Does VS's language server protocol handle the ability to deal with nested language grammars each with nested contexts? My issue is false negatives: IntelliJ usually just "works", especially with Java, it's near perfection and almost never gives a wrong completion. I've never encountered another IDE whose code understanding was as complete. Even a 2-3% false completion rate is super annoying. Plus, the refactoring, structural search, and callstack analysis stuff is beyond reproach. Can VS tell me all possible reaching expressions to a given method? I've used that before to figure out what kinds of subtypes or nullability a given parameter has, but it requires global code understanding. I feel like the kind of functionality that grok style code indexing provides is just the baseline, and what's important is what's built on top of it. VSC has a long way to go to reach IJ in that regard.