It's a little arrogant, but the commenter is probably more or less correct. Twitter is bloated. Their headcount has expanded quite a lot over the last few yea

It's a little arrogant, but the commenter is probably more or less correct. Twitter is bloated. Their headcount has expanded quite a lot over the last few years - and for what? Their service has remained the same and 'scale' beyond a certain point does not matter. What is 'labour intensive' - sales? Sure. Maybe some support staff? I doubt they're full time, more likely in Phillipenes off the books. I don't doubt for a second that they didn't need all those staff members - I've worked enough 'fast growth' places to see how 'hiring for the sake of hiring' happens, it's a political orientation, not really an economic one.