4 ms·
Bluemix is SaaS/PaaS, not IaaS.
by binarymax 9y ago
Bluemix is SaaS/PaaS, not IaaS.
- murukesh_s 9y agoIBM Bluemix got an IaaS layer as well. It was previously called softlayer, but is now wrapped under the Bluemix brand. https://www.ibm.com/cloud-computing/bluemix/info/softlayer-is-now-bluemix?cm_mc_uid=96100074724015090431975&cm_mc_sid_50200000=1509043197&cm_mc_sid_52640000=1509043197 https://www.ibm.com/cloud-computing/bluemix/info/softlayer-i...
- binarymax 9y agoAh didn't know that, thanks! <strike> Looking further though, I see Softlayer does offer GPU for bare metal provisioning [0]. But it is not available in Virtual machines. Also, even for the GPU offering, it doesn't mention the details at all, not even if it is OpenCL or CUDA. [0] https://www.ibm.com/cloud-computing/bluemix/bare-metal-search?datacenters=All&hourlyBilling=1&startingMonthlyPrice%5Bmin%5D=100&startingMonthlyPrice%5Bmax%5D=26000&maximumRamCapacity%5Bmin%5D=2&maximumRamCapacity%5Bmax%5D=8192&processorSpeed%5Bmin%5D=2&processorSpeed%5Bmax%5D=4&maximumDriveCount%5Bmin%5D=1&maximumDriveCount%5Bmax%5D=36&gpuFlag%5B1%5D=1&startingHourlyPrice%5Bmin%5D=0.368&startingHourlyPrice%5Bmax%5D=5.500 https://www.ibm.com/cloud-computing/bluemix/bare-metal-searc... </strike> EDIT - nevermind, was looking in the wrong place! Found this: https://www.ibm.com/cloud-computing/bluemix/gpu-computing https://www.ibm.com/cloud-computing/bluemix/gpu-computing
- Operyl 9y agoHaving had experience with SoftLayer in recent years (that is, currently still deal with them and have for years), I can’t emphasize enough that you should steer clear. Year after year support and just overall stability has fallen to shit after IBMs acquisition. I can’t wait to be free of it.
- solotronics 9y agosorry you have had a bad experience. Do you mind sharing what could be improved? disclaimer: I am one of the core network engineers and my opinions expressed here are my own and not official statements
- Operyl 9y agoWhen you say there’s going to be four minutes of network outage in a four hour window, I relay that to our clients. It seems to consistently push into 30 minutes. Just say 30 minutes up front and it’ll be daisy. Also, it seems like I have to pull out teeth when I have a VSI go down because of host (dom0) failure. When I call in, I literally have to argue with the support engineer that the machine is down so he doesn’t waste 30 minutes of everyone’s time to “debug” what I already know to be true (I.e. if I can’t trigger a force restart on the VSI from control or API, and the VSI is down, and “KVM” to it is down, just fucking trust me and escalate). Also, why the hell cant a ticket auto open for that, or even just a manual “open tickets to all accounts affected” button. There’s zero communication with customers, compare that to Google Cloud or the much smaller Linode. It’s really pathetic. My list of grievances can go on and on. My current one is “why did you all bother migrating us all to hardware supposedly capable of live migration, just to not use it and tell me the earlier migrated machines need to be migrated again because you all used me as a guinea pig before putting them on LTS machines!” EDIT: also, since this is your domain, what exactly has been happening in lon/ams with networking? SoftLayer used to pride itself with its network, but it feels subpar at best now.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- solotronics 9y agoin your opinion would it be better to overestimate as a precaution? I think people generally tend to naturally estimate a scenario where things go as planned and present that. About lon02 we are actually currently going through a migration to new routers and there was some possible impact communicated to customers. Many apologies it didn't go as smoothly as hoped.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]