I also fell in love with the dream of the democratizing effect of the internet. The problem is that speech isn't free (as in free beer). It's a commodity. The

I also fell in love with the dream of the democratizing effect of the internet. The problem is that speech isn't free (as in free beer). It's a commodity. The wealthier or more powerful get more of it. When people see messages frequently they tend to believe them [1]. It doesn't matter how direct your democracy is if people can be strongly influenced to vote as desired. I used to believe that a sufficiently intelligent and enlightened being could lead a democracy. Rules for Rulers says this is impossible, because the altruistic entity would always lose to the practical power-optimizing one. [1] https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-new-resilience/201210/why-youre-likely-believe-political-lies https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-new-resilience/2012...