3 ms·
Not worth it. The blocking that the government uses blocks only the http version of the sites. Append an s manually and access is restored. But to the uninitiat
by zuron7 9y ago
Not worth it. The blocking that the government uses blocks only the http version of the sites. Append an s manually and access is restored. But to the uninitiated that block poses enough of a challenge.
- timthelion 9y agoBut if we are speculating on what sort of websites are blocked, that method would reduce the uncertainty. It might even lead to the uncovering of something scandalous, like the discovery of a website being blocked for revealing evil truths about the current government.
- wav-part 9y agoNot true anymore. https are getting blocked too. Last few lines of `curl --trace - https://thepiratebay.org/` https://thepiratebay.org/` on Jio ISP. Full log https://gist.github.com/anonymous/27ddfa674233d8d17a007f1b3fc1106e https://gist.github.com/anonymous/27ddfa674233d8d17a007f1b3f... => Send SSL data, 5 bytes (0x5) 0000: 15 03 03 00 1a ..... == Info: TLSv1.2 (OUT), TLS alert, Server hello (2): => Send SSL data, 2 bytes (0x2) 0000: 02 46 .F == Info: error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version number == Info: Closing connection 0 So TLS handshake is being interrupted. If you think about it, https blocking is actually more efficient. curl log does not show the last fake rcvd packet. Anyone know how to do that ?