12 ms·
The title in Nature: “Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage” A brief description of what was accomplished (a modification
by drvdevd 9y ago
The title in Nature: “Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage”
A brief description of what was accomplished (a modification of cas9): “We evolved a tRNA adenosine deaminase to operate on DNA when fused to a catalytically impaired CRISPR-Cas9. Extensive directed evolution and protein engineering resulted in seventh-generation ABEs (e.g., ABE7.10), that convert target A•T to G•C base pairs efficiently (~50% in human cells) with very high product purity (typically ≥ 99.9%) and very low rates of indels (typically ≤ 0.1%).“
Translation: they modified the CRISPR associated DNA editing enzyme, cas9, to “deaminate” (remove or otherwise alter the amino groups) in A-T or G-C pairs without breaking the DNA, as cas9 normally would.
This makes single point precision edits possible, but I’m not sure what that implies for the “guide RNA” cas9 needs to know where to make the edits, as I haven’t read the paper in full yet.
- 88e282102ae2e5b 9y ago> they modified the CRISPR associated DNA editing enzyme, cas9 This is incorrect. They modified a separate enzyme that is fused to cas9.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- evincarofautumn 9y agoI think that’s what they meant, and said. Cas9 “CRISPR associated protein 9” is the protein/enzyme that they modified.
- 88e282102ae2e5b 9y agoI'm definitely getting into hair-splitting territory, but I think it's important to not conflate modifying a protein with fusing two proteins. It would be easy to come away from the GP and think that scientists have the ability to easily change the enzymatic function of Cas9, when in reality they're effectively just connecting a protein to Cas9 and letting it do its thing.
- evincarofautumn 9y agoAh, I see what you’re getting at. I agree.