> Even a cursory glance at my posting history would make a mockery of that claim. Drop the empty rhetoric, bring in the evidence. Hah! Just looking at your pos

> Even a cursory glance at my posting history would make a mockery of that claim. Drop the empty rhetoric, bring in the evidence. Hah! Just looking at your posting history _in this thread_ would lay waste to your statement. You said that people had to prove to you widely known facts. Fine. When people gave you evidence in terms of links, you dismissed the links and said in a huge educational system, how is this a pattern? That's a neat rhetorical trick by the way. If the evidence is too specific and easily substantiated, it doesn't indicate a pattern. A broadly based claim is dismissed as rumors and anecdote, and obviously not specific enough to be evidence. Head you win, tails I lose. Nice. I'm looking forward to seeing you respond to the other specifics that we brought up. Probably not evidence of a pattern eh? > This site has such incredible ups, but the downs are equally staggering and disheartening. You do know your comment is funny, and even funnier because you have no idea that we're all laughing at you?