Even if you wrote in your later replies here that (your words follow) "the math in the original article is more or less solid, no errors were found since public

Even if you wrote in your later replies here that (your words follow) "the math in the original article is more or less solid, no errors were found since publication in 2016" that statement seems quite dishonest, as you also wrote later, as you communicated with me, that you are aware of the direct rebuttal, which was published shortly after the article appeared, which I link here and quote the abstract if full: https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.02882 https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.02882 "We show that a recent assertion [arXiv:1608.01541] that gravitational wave emission can lead to a repulsive force explaining the accelerated expansion of the Universe is totally unfounded." I think it can't be shorter and more precise. I also thank you here for the information about that rebuttal article, as well as about another article which mentions how wrong the Gorkavyi's article is https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.07136 https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.07136 both of which I haven't been aware of before the communication with you.