As stated in the article: Any number of other iOS apps exist to display content bought/subscribed-to elsewhere. Given the apparent double-standard, I'd say the

As stated in the article: Any number of other iOS apps exist to display content bought/subscribed-to elsewhere. Given the apparent double-standard, I'd say the burden of proof is on Time to demonstrate that they really were unfairly rejected and the problem isn't something along the lines of their implementation violating the ToS.