3 ms·
It's not $250 to receive packages when you're not home, it's $250 to receive packages securely without the possibility of them being stolen from your front porc
by Klathmon 9y ago
It's not $250 to receive packages when you're not home, it's $250 to receive packages securely without the possibility of them being stolen from your front porch.
And it's just a different "implementation" of many other products that have been invented to do the same thing. [0] is a "package lock box" that gives a similar result for $230. But it's ugly, won't store larger boxes, and is often harder to get your delivery people to use.
If your packages are getting repeatedly stolen, I don't think it's any more "crazy" than you replacing a faulty computer part in your PC. Yes, that's a "modern society problem" as well, but it's not crazy in the slightest...
[0] http://a.co/efwOSZf http://a.co/efwOSZf
- EADGBE 9y agoAlso, you're buying a smart deadbolt and indoor security camera...