3 ms·
That's not a very fair comparison. And while I'm sure MacOS isn't exactly cheap I never encountered a situation where I had to use some piece of software that r
by simias 9y ago
That's not a very fair comparison. And while I'm sure MacOS isn't exactly cheap I never encountered a situation where I had to use some piece of software that required me to run MacOS.
For what it's worth I was mainly thinking of the Linux/BSDs that I actually want to use when given the choice
It's free forever, easily customizable to fit my various needs, from embedded barebones application to media server to workstation. I actually own and control the OS (my debian doesn't upgrade to a new version behind my back) and I can even dig into the code if I want to.
I'd sooner give 100 euros to the FreeBSD fountation than 10 euros to MS frankly. I gave them enough money indirectly already with all these prebuilt computers I've bought in the past decades which came with Windows preinstalled, only for me to immediately wipe them with something else.
- moron4hire 9y agoThat's just your particular case and not indicative of the situation as a whole. I regularly encounter software that requires me to run macOS. I build virtual and augmented reality software. macOS is garbage for VR, all the major VR systems work better on Windows. But, if you want to build AR apps for iPhones (or any sort of game app, doesn't have to be AR), you need Xcode, and Xcode only runs on macOS.