4 ms·
>My first flash thought was a place for funding hate. That's unfortunately not a bad guess. Go check out some of their "featured creators". It's pretty much th
by badlucklottery 9y ago
>My first flash thought was a place for funding hate.
That's unfortunately not a bad guess. Go check out some of their "featured creators". It's pretty much the bottom of the hate speech barrel.
- corobo 9y agoAh so it suffers from (or targets) the reddit->voat problem where a userbase is comprised solely of those rejected from the normal site[]. [] Please forgive the use of the word normal, I couldn't think of a better word. "Default site" or maybe "usual site" might work better
- icebraining 9y agoOriginal site, maybe.
- JCharante 9y agoWhat's wrong with normal? The more popular site is the normal one when it comes to finding content creators. Hatrons or voaters aren't going to be triggered by the use of the word "normal".
- corobo 9y agoPeoples' triggerings aren't my concern, my concern is not conveying what I mean accurately and getting bogged down in the nitty gritty of how I say things rather than what I'm saying
- dmerfield 9y agoThey're the hardest people to defend and that's exactly why their freedom of speech needs to be defended. When you can't say 'fuck', you can't say 'fuck the draft': https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohen_v._California https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohen_v._California