4 ms·

Same here. Odd choices, but I'm assuming there's a reason for it.

• samstave 9y ago
  Just a guess, but I would bet that they are looking for the people who want aurora+postgress on larger workloads (ostensibly housed in far fewer accounts/support-blast-radius) than to offer shards to thousands of one-off testers/smaller companies that may inundate the bandwidth of the actual human staff.
  • llsf 9y ago
    I thought the same, but the Aurora MySQL does allow smaller instances. So, waiting as well for smaller instances on Aurora Postgres...
    • markporter_aws 9y ago
      Which particular types and combination of CPU/RAM would you like?
      • jeffasinger 9y ago
        At a minimum, I'd like to see something half the size of the r4.large. The current r4.large is definitely bigger than I'd want to use for an experiment with a few users.
        • markporter_aws 9y ago
          Jeff, that makes sense. We're working on it. Thanks for the information!