> I'm really not sure what your argument is here. My argument is what I originally wrote, "Treaties on Earth have very little meaning. They have zero meaning o

> I'm really not sure what your argument is here. My argument is what I originally wrote, "Treaties on Earth have very little meaning. They have zero meaning on the Moon." That argument is supported by the contents of your link. You posted a link to show a treaty that has been in force. However, your link shows the exact opposite of that. The treaty has never been in force, was started because an earlier treaty wasn't followed, and has been superseded multiple times by other treaties.