Ideally we would want an accurate trajectory of forecasted change to map the cost/savings, but the trajectory keeps getting readjusted and the cost/savings is f

Ideally we would want an accurate trajectory of forecasted change to map the cost/savings, but the trajectory keeps getting readjusted and the cost/savings is fairly subjective, so modeling this is pretty much fruitless. Cost fails to account for economic development as a result of the hurricanes and subtract that from economic damage. Savings measurement requires accounting for theoretical scenarios which by nature are malleable. Or you could just assume we're all gonna die and no actions will be sufficient, then we can all just stop working on climate change and save some extra dollars for the ride out.