3 ms·
There's no evidence of that, more than %90 of miners are running core, and there are more businesses opposed to 2x than endorsing it: http://nob2x.org http://no
by rothbardrand 9y ago
There's no evidence of that, more than %90 of miners are running core, and there are more businesses opposed to 2x than endorsing it: http://nob2x.org http://nob2x.org
Meanwhile "signers" of the New York "Agreement"[1] are dropping like flies, most recent Coinbase that says they will support the core chain.
Hell the biggest "proponents" of 2X aren't willing to risk their own bitcoin in a swap (eg: Ver who has backed out of such promises in the past too with BCH)
2X is nothing but a scam to get suckers to sell BTC for B2X while people like Ver sell B2X to get more BTC!
Its funny how the bitcoin haters talk about censorship-- reality is /r/bitcoin is not censored, but the entire 2x movement was done behind closed doors, with no peer review, with a heavily censored slack channel and mailing list-- that is if you can get on it in the first place... while bitcoin does all this in public.
2X hasn't had commits or serious work in months last I checked and I really feel sad for the people who bought the propaganda these scammers are selling.
[1] It's not an agreement when only one side agreed with itself.
- j_s 9y ago> reality is /r/bitcoin is not censored As a complete outsider not paying much attention this is the first time I've ever seen anyone try to make this claim, it seems easily disproven.
- rothbardrand 9y agoIt's easily proven-- go there and look at all the /r/btc brigading going on. The subreddit is full of trolls. And of course whenever one gets abusive and is banned they cry censorship. Now look at my comment you are replying to-- -3 -- an attempt to downvote it into oblivion with no actual responses (other than yours) to the points I made. There is censorship going on, but the ones crying the loudest are the worst offenders.